Health Care Revolt and Election Fraud

Health Care Revolution and Election Fraud?
By Ryan Riell

Tomorrow in Massachusetts is a big day for our Nation, with a republican candidate Steve Brown running against progressive Martha Coakley. Let me be clear up front- this is a vote on health care and the progressive Obama administration in addition to the progressive Congress. With a 3.5:1 ratio of registered democrats to registered republicans in Massachusetts and a senate seat that has been a “democrat” seat since 1952, the fact that there is a race going on is enough of a rebuke to the progressive agenda

The average of the five major polls from today shows state senator Brown leading Coakley by 6.8 points, which might or might not be enough to overcome the democratic machine that has generated votes for their candidates in the past. Remember Acorn… I’m guessing you will hear more about them over the next few days due to their voter registration campaign across the country.

Will we see radical left-winger George Soros’s “Secretary of State Project” (see last blog post for more information on the SOS), where the progressives have installed progressives throughout the country in the position of SOS just for a case like this- where the vote might be close. Voter fraud has been a staple of the big cities when a democratic candidate is down by as much as 5%. Look back at the same senate seat election in 1952 with Jack Kennedy… election fraud!

Minnesota SOS Mark Ritchie, who is supported by Acorn and handpicked by Soro’s SOS project, is the guy who cut off the counting of absentee ballots in the Senate race and certified Al Frankin as their newest Senator.

The Massachusetts Secretary of State (SOS) William Galvin will be in charge of counting the votes. Hopefully, someone is there to watch over the counting of the absentee ballots, since he is in control of those too. Hopefully, Galvin is not part of Soro’s SOS Project.

Galvin is already on the record for saying it will take a while to certify Brown if he wins, citing the 10 days that is customary. This all sounds on the up-and-up right? Not so fast, the Boston Harold reported that in October 2007, it only took two (2) days to certify representative Niki Tsongas after a special election.

Why does this matter? If Brown wins this election and is seated quickly, he will break the 60-vote supermajority the progressives hold on the senate, which would allow the republicans to filibuster the health care bill and hopefully prevent it from ever becoming reality.

This can all be tied nicely back into the unions, primarily SEIU, who dumped roughly $680,000 into Coakley’s campaign in the last week. Remember, Andy Stern, the SEIU president whom is the most frequent visitor to the White House. Are you starting to see the level of corruption going on in Washington and in the Obama administration? Are you a union member? Is this what you want your union dues going towards?


The progressively biased media had this to say about the special election tomorrow, over the last few days… you tell me, is there a bias?

“With just four days left to go in the race for Teddy Kennedy’s Senate seat, a new poll is terrible news for democrats. The 60th vote in the senate may be health care hanging in the balance Chuck, I’m interested now. NBC’s deputy political director Mark Murray joins us now- this is bad.” (MSNBC, January 15th)

Chris Matthews, the host of MSNBC’s Hard Ball said, “Maybe I shouldn’t be harkening back to the old days. If the democrats faced this disaster in the works, you’d go back to your ‘ones’, the people you were sure were going to vote democrat and you’d make sure they’d get to the polling place. You’d get them lunch, you’d get them a car, you’d make sure they got there. And in some cases you would be buying people to get them, not officially buying them, but getting them there as block secretaries, block captains, you would be getting them there with street money. Legitimate, but a little old school.”

“Well we wanna talk about a crisis potentially looming at home- Massachusetts. The president is making last minute trip to Boston to campaign for democrat Martha Coakley.” (NBC Today Show January 16th)

“Has democratic leaning Massachusetts lost its mind?” (MSNBC, January 18th)

The progressives in this country are pulling out all the stops to win this election. Coakley herself turned a Martin Luther King remembrance breakfast into her personal campaign rally while asking for people’s votes when she took the stage. You can also listen to what the else Chris Matthews said “well if we reach back to one of our hero’s from the past, from the 60’s, Saul Alinski”, who teaches the progressive movement and that the ends justify the means and that there are NO ethics as long as they win. It would be really interesting if they took that same approach to fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

How about MSNBC host Ed Schultz “I tell you what, if I lived in Massachusetts I’d try to vote 10 times. I don’t know if they’d let me or not, but I’d try to… Yeah that’s right. I’d cheat to keep these bastards out I would. Cause that’s exactly what they are.” on his radio show last Friday. He went on to clarify that statement today by saying “I misspoke on Friday. I’m sorry. I’m sorry. I meant to say if I could vote 20 times—that’s what I would do.”

Remember the “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming America” speech that came out of President Obama’s mouth? Are you starting to see the bigger picture? It’s time to get smart on what your rights are before the progressive movement turns this country into Europe light.

On Sunday, President Obama made the trip up to Boston to stump for Coakley, which shows exactly how desperate the progressives are… Obama is the proverbial “last round” in the magazine. He is 0 for 2 when stumping for events and politicians (2016 Chicago Olympics and the NJ Governors race).

Do you remember back to the campaign in 2008 when we heard all about the transparency and about the “change” that was coming to DC? Lets take a look at some of the key points of what the President had to say while stumping for Coakley and read between the lines… you tell me if this is the change you voted for. Keep this in mind- you cannot listen to what this man says; you have to look at what he’s doing!

THE PRESIDENT: “And that's what she's done. Look at her record. As a prosecutor, she took on cases most of us don't even want to think about, putting murderers and child abusers away. See the cases of a toddler that was sexually assaulted with a curling iron that took 10 months for her to file charges or the charges she brought against a father for forcefully stopping an illegal alien (who was released) and the father was charged with assault. As attorney general, she took on Wall Street and recovered millions for Massachusett’s taxpayers -- took on predatory lenders that were taking advantage of Massachusett’s families. Redistribution of wealth here? She went after big insurance companies that misled people into buying coverage only to deny it when they got sick. Redistribution of wealth here? She went after big polluters who put the health of your family at risk. More redistribution of wealth via climate change? Time and again, Martha has taken on those who game the system at expense of hardworking, middle-class families.” The health care bill and cap and trade bill are going to financially crush the “hardworking, middle-class families”. How about religious bigotry towards Catholics, but in reality, all Christians- “You can have religious freedom but you probably shouldn’t work in the emergency room”

THE PRESIDENT: “But here's the thing. You know how politics is. At times like this, there are always some who are eager to exploit that pain and anger to score a few political points. See the $700 billion TARP, $787 billion stimulus package, $187 billion to AIG, $83 billion for GM and Chrysler and the proposed $1 trillion health care bill. There are always folks who think that the best way to solve these problems are to demonize others.” See the progressive attacks on anyone who disagrees with their cause, calling them racists, bigots and fear mongers- check out mediamatters.org for some vial examples.


PRESIDENT: “Now, I've heard about some of the ads that Martha's opponent is running. He's driving his truck around the commonwealth -- (laughter) I highly recommend listening to this portion, apparently President Obama was speaking to an elitist crowd since he was demeaning people who drive pick up trucks-- and he says that he gets you, that he fights for you, that he'll be an independent voice. And I don't know him, he may be a perfectly nice guy. I don't know his record, but I don't know whether he's been fighting for you up until now, but –“

AUDIENCE: “Noooo!”

THE PRESIDENT: “But here's what I do know. I do want somebody who's independent. I want a senator who's always going to put the interests of working folks all across Massachusetts first -- ahead of party, ahead of special interests... See the most frequent visitor to the White House, Andy Stern, the president of SEIU. See the list of Union heads that met behind closed doors to ensure they were exempt from the $60 billion in Cadillac taxes for the unsustainable health care policies they have promised their workers. (Applause) And here's what I know is that. So I hear her opponent is calling himself an independent. Well, you've got to look under the hood -- (laughter) who is looking under the Obama hood? Shall I list out the radical czars and advisors that he has running around the White House and throughout his administration? -- because what you learn makes you wonder. Now, as a legislator, he voted with the Republicans 96 percent of the time -- 96 percent of the time. It's hard to suggest that he's going to be significantly independent from the Republican agenda. And that he opposes President Obama’s progressive redistribution of wealth agenda. When you listen closely to what he's been saying, it's very clear that he's going to do exactly the same thing in Washington.

So, look, forget the ads. Everybody can run slick ads. Forget the truck. (Laughter) Again, demeaning pick up truck owners. Everybody can buy a truck. (Laughter) Apparently he hasn’t looked at the economy, people are having a hard time paying their bills as it is let alone buying a new truck. Here's the question you need to ask yourselves before you go to vote on Tuesday, Massachusetts. When the chips are down, when the tough votes come, on all the fights that matter to middle-class families across this commonwealth, who is going to be on your side?” Do you want someone who will be in lockstep with the Obama administration, ensuring that the $1 trillion healthcare bill passes and that the cap and trade bill passes, which will increase the cost of every form of energy?

THE PRESIDENT: “What Martha’s opponent is trying has already been tried and it didn’t work. President Obama is still in campaign mode, rallying against GW Bush. President Obama still needs to read a good leadership book, he has yet to take responsibility for the mess that he is contributing to. So understand what’s at stake here Massachusetts. Healthcare, Cap and Trade and all the other progressive measures on their agenda. It’s whether we are going forward or going backwards. It’s whether we are going to have a future where everyone gets a shot in this society or just the privileged few. Lets reexamine what the FCC’s diversity czar and former senior fellow at George Soros’s Center for American Progress, Mark Lloyd said “There’s nothing more difficult than this, because we have really, truly good white people in important positions and the fact of the matter is there are a limited number of those positions… unless we are conscious of the need to have more people of color, gays, other people in those positions, we will not change the problem. We are in a position where you have to say who is going to step down so someone else can have power”

If that’s not convincing enough about “a [fair] shot in this society”, how about President Obama’s own words: “If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and it’s litigation strategy in the courts, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed people... but the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in the society... it didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution at least as it been interpreted, and more important interpreted in the same way that generally, the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf and that hasn’t shifted!”

This is the front line of the battle against progressives to believe it or not, protect our rights that are guaranteed to us by the US Constitution.